Skip to content

Journal Article

Care Continuity, Nephrologists’ Dialysis Facility Preferences, and Outcomes

Press Contact: Jason Millman (213)-821-0099

Image / Shutterstock

Key Points

Question  Is care continuity with the predialysis nephrologist associated with dialysis start quality?

Findings  In this cohort study of 143 776 adults, patients with fee-for-service Medicare often started dialysis at their nephrologists’ primary facilities (ie, where nephrologists spent the most time) even when they were low quality. Patients had significantly higher hospitalization rates when their nephrologists had low-quality primary facilities, and Black patients more often had nephrologists with low-quality primary facilities and had lower quality dialysis starts.

Meaning  These findings suggest that a nephrologist’s primary facility is associated with dialysis start quality and that there are prominent racial disparities in access to nephrologists with high-quality primary facilities; policies that promote improved access to high-quality dialysis facilities may be necessary to alleviate these disparities.

Abstract

Importance  Patients may initiate dialysis at their predialysis nephrologists’ primary facilities (ie, where the nephrologist saw the most patients) to preserve continuity of care, even if the facilities are of low quality. Patients from minoritized racial and ethnic groups may be the most negatively impacted.

Objective  To examine starts at nephrologists’ primary facilities, downstream outcomes, and racial disparities in dialysis start quality.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study used Medicare administrative data of patients initiating dialysis at freestanding US dialysis facilities from January 1, 2015, to October 31, 2020, with 1 year of follow-up (ending October 31, 2021). Analyses concluded January 26, 2025. Participants were adults with fee-for-service Medicare initiating dialysis.

Exposures  Quality of nephrologists’ primary facilities (using publicly available 5-star ratings) and primary facilities’ proximity to patients.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcomes were starting dialysis at the nephrologist’s primary facility (ie, primary facility starts), whether the starting facility was high quality (ie, 4-star or 5-star ratings), mortality and hospitalization rates, and racial and ethnic disparities in high-quality primary facilities and in starting dialysis at high-quality facilities. Analyses used multivariable linear and Poisson regression with hospital service area fixed effects (unique intercepts for each area).

Results  Of 143 776 adults (median [IQR] age, 73 [67-79] years; 64 447 female [45%]; 4989 Asian [3%]; 28 515 Black [20%]; 11 296 Hispanic [8%]; 96 639 non-Hispanic White [67%]), 64 186 (45%) had managing nephrologists with high-quality primary facilities. Primary facility starts were lower as the primary facility’s quality increased (0.5 percentage points [pp] lower for every 1-star increase in rating; 95% CI, 0.1-0.8 pp; P = .03). In contrast, primary facility starts were 33.9 pp (95% CI, 33.0-34.9 pp; P < .001) more likely when primary facilities were close to patients than when distant. Each additional quality star in nephrologists’ primary facility was associated with more 4-star or 5-star facility starts (7.4 pp; 95% CI, 6.9-7.9 pp) and 4.5 fewer hospitalizations per 100 person-years (95% CI, 2.8-6.1 hospitalizations per 100 person-years). Compared with White patients, Black patients were 2.8 pp (95% CI, 1.7-3.9 pp) less likely to start at 4-star or 5-star facilities and 2.0 pp (95% CI, 1.0-3.0 pp) less likely to be treated by nephrologists with 4-star or 5-star primary facilities.

Conclusions and Relevance  Primary facility starts were common even when they were low quality, and outcomes were worse when nephrologists had low-quality primary facilities. Black patients disproportionately start dialysis at low-quality facilities and are less likely to have nephrologists with high-quality primary facilities. Policies that promote improved access to high-quality dialysis facilities may be necessary to alleviate these disparities.

The full study can be viewed at JAMA Health Forum.

Lin, E., Lung, K., Rapista, D., Kuo, L., Lakdawalla, D., Peneva, D., & Van Nuys, K. (2025). Care continuity, nephrologists’ dialysis facility preferences, and outcomes. JAMA Health Forum, 6(4), e250423–e250423. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2025.0423