Skip to content

Search Results: insulin

Who Is Really Driving Up Insulin Costs?

https://schaeffer.usc.edu/research/who-is-really-driving-up-insulin-costs/

In the long term, capping insulin payments at $35 a month is just shuffling the deck rather than changing the game of insulin costs.

The Price of Insulin, Explained

https://schaeffer.usc.edu/research/the-price-of-insulin/

This animation explains research by Schaeffer Center experts that offers one of the most comprehensive looks at the insulin distribution chain and shows which players are profiting, and by how much, from selling insulin.

Estimation of the Share of Net Expenditures on Insulin Captured by US Manufacturers, Wholesalers, Pharmacy Benefit Managers, Pharmacies, and Health Plans From 2014 to 2018

https://schaeffer.usc.edu/research/estimation-of-the-share-of-net-expenditures-on-insulin-captured-by-us-manufacturers-wholesalers-pharmacy-benefit-managers-pharmacies-and-health-plans-from-2014-to-2018/

Recent US media and policy attention on insulin affordability has focused on the role of manufacturers in setting prices; however, the role of other drug distribution intermediaries in determining prices has received less attention.

Untangling the Price of Insulin

https://schaeffer.usc.edu/research/untangling-the-price-of-insulin/

Despite its discovery nearly 100 years ago, insulin’s list price has been going up, not down. Schaeffer Center researchers analyze the flow of money across all distribution system participants—manufacturers, wholesalers, pharmacies, pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs), and health plans.

Washington Is on the Verge of True PBM Reform

https://schaeffer.usc.edu/research/pbm-reform-fair-act-fiduciary/

Congress and regulators at last are converging on a practical, market-based response to align PBMs’ incentives with employers and patients.

The Case for Expanding Access to Weight-Loss Medications

https://schaeffer.usc.edu/research/the-case-for-expanding-access-to-weight-loss-medications/

Widespread access to GLP-1 therapies could generate significant benefits to society and produce huge savings for Medicare, Schaeffer research shows.

Cui Bono? Misaligned Incentives in the 340B Program

https://schaeffer.usc.edu/research/misaligned-incentives-340b/

340B providers leverage spread pricing to generate revenue, creating unintended consequences in the broader healthcare market. This white paper addresses potential opportunities to restructure program benefits.

Testimony on Competition Issues in the Prescription Drug Supply Chain

https://schaeffer.usc.edu/research/testimony-on-competition-issues-prescription-drug-supply-chain/

Implementing reforms that increase transparency, align incentives and restore competition can ensure that PBMs fulfill their intended role: helping to make prescription drugs more affordable and accessible for all Americans.

Future Elderly Model (FEM)

https://schaeffer.usc.edu/data/future-elderly-model/

The Future Elderly Model (FEM) is an economic-demographic microsimulation developed over the last decade by researchers with funding from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, the National Institute on Aging, the Department of Labor and the MacArthur Foundation. Its development is led by the Schaeffer Center for Health Policy & Economics with collaborators from Harvard…